Posts Tagged ‘George Osborne’

THIS WEEK AT TORY CONFERENCE – By Michael Taylor, Insider

Thursday, October 8th, 2009

I saw the light and the dark sides of the Tories in Manchester this week. Their nutters were much in evidence at certain fringe meetings. First there was an absolutely barking mad woman sat at the front of an IoD fringe meeting who said “all regulation should be abolished,” which even John Redwood on scary mad-eyed (brilliant) form had to correct her. Secondly, I put my head round the door of a Freedom Association meeting at the Bridgewater Hall and Redwood was there again. Then I got really scared when I stopped for a chat to the people from the Taxpayers Alliance. I chose not to take a car sticker with “Love Europe Hate the EU” on it.

But on the lighter side I saw two different meetings where Philip Hammond was impressive. In one on the need for public sector cuts he got mildly wound up by Polly Toynbee from the Guardian (which doesn’t make him a bad man in my book). He is also quite resolute in the need to balance the books. George Osborne’s later announcement about public sector pay freezes is part of the package of reform he is wrestling with. I suspect he has been doing the work for Osborne in this. There were many mutterings around the fringe that concluded that Hammond is a far more credible figure on an issue as critical as the economy and public finances.

It’s been interesting too to see how the policy to “reform the regional development agencies” has been interpreted as “abolish” by very senior speakers at events. At a Localis event to launch a new report Can Localism Deliver, Shadow Communities Secretary Caroline Spellman spoke of “reform” and let them see the wood for the trees. The glum looking officials from the NWDA that we saw around the place have, until now, been putting a brave face on things. But it’s a visible quick fix that rouses the rabble. Presumably now every two bit local authority will have their own economic development, regeneration and tourism marketing people to make up for what the NWDA won’t be doing. How’s that an effeciency?

But there is also positive and progressive evidence of a moral compass to the Tory agenda. I satiated my intrigue in the ideas of “progressive conservative” Philip Blond at an event organised by the Conservative Christian Fellowship, where he fleshed out some of his thoughts on what constitutes “a common good”. Through his think tank Respublica, it is said that Blond has provided David Cameron’s “mood music”.

From the North West reception on Monday night, through to slightly giddy fringe meetings around the city, I have detected a certain triumphalism. They need to be careful about that. There is still a mountain to climb. And Cameron wisely issued the edict for them to say “if” not “when” they win an election and have been warned not to drink champagne, a warning he failed to heed himself.

That all said, on Thursday David Cameron whipped the activists up with a message to put fire in their bellies. It was never going to be: “go back to your constituencies and prepare for a coalition.” It certainly won’t wash with the nutters, but they have always been part of the problem.

AGENCY IS VALUE FOR MONEY

Friday, June 12th, 2009

It came as no surprise to me that an independent study has given a big thumbs up to the work of the Northwest Development Agency.

Led by Steven Broomhead, the NWDA has added at least £4.50 to the regional economy for every £1.00 spent, according to the investigation that was undertaken by PricewaterhouseCoopers.

The organization that was established to attract investment and jobs, has created or saved 97,000 jobs, created 3,500 businesses, supported 14,000 businesses and helped 97,000 people improve their skills, according to the study.

It is somewhat baffling, therefore, that the Agency is under threat of abolition from an incoming Conservative Government.

I discussed this issue with Shadow Chancellor George Osborne at a Downtown event last week.
The Tories view is that economic development and regeneration should be managed by local government.

The problem here is twofold. Over the past twenty years, local council’s have been stripped of powers and responsibilities, and therefore the capacity of local authorities to deliver major strategies is, at best, questionable.

Second, parochialism is something that, as we have seen time and again, gets in the way of progress, making the delivery of strategic projects extremely difficult.

Example? Blackpool and Blackburn objecting to the Tithebarn project, a potential £700 million investment into the Lancashire economy.

The notion of devolving power to elected local representatives may be a worthy principle. But in practice, such a move would put the North West region back years, and undo a lot of the good work delivered by the NWDA.